Court ruling on Sarastia clarifies in-house company rules, say industry associations
The Supreme Administrative Court found that Sarastia did not meet the criteria of an in-house company.
YRITTÄJÄ, tule mukaan omiesi pariin! Liity Yrittäjiin.
JÄSEN, oletko jo ladannut Yrittäjät-sovelluksen puhelimeesi? Lataa sovellus Androidille tai Applelle.
The Supreme Administrative Court found that Sarastia did not meet the criteria of an in-house company.
Are your company’s contracts in order? Business contracts – agreements between companies – are part of everyday business life. By…
The changes we proposed would improve YEL policyholders’ equitable treatment. The 2023 entrepreneur pension or YEL reform included a transitional…
The Ministry of Justice has published an information package on reducing disruption on business premises. The Orpo Government is continuing…
Without a prenuptial agreement, an ex-spouse is entitled to part of the business. Divorce can catch business owners unawares if…
The ruling took almost five years to be delivered. The Supreme Administrative Court (SAC) has rules that Wolt food delivery…
The Patent and Registration Office reminds companies about what kinds of auditors can be approved. The Patent and Registration Office…
Suomen Yrittäjät, the Finnish SME association, has received a large number of messages about sole traders’ problems caused by the…
Suomen Yrittäjät, the Finnish SME association, demands swift action from Parliament to rein in cheap Chinese e-retailers. On 5 February,…
As of 2025, the Patent and Registration Office (PRH) can issue new charges to companies which have not submitted their…